Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

2010-01-06 Thread Vollstrecker
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 schrieb Giuseppe Iuculano: > I don't know why you got criticized For packages where payload and metainformation are nearly the same size. But that's another story. > , but there are many other > packages that provide gnome-support with few small files, see > iceweas

Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

2010-01-06 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Vollstrecker ha scritto: > So one package for one single small file? I got critized for spltting > the translations and the utils into separate packages (which I have > still reasons for). Where's the difference? I don't know why you got criticized, but there are many other packages that provide

Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

2010-01-05 Thread Vollstrecker
Am Dienstag 05 Januar 2010 schrieb Giuseppe Iuculano: > > everything, but I as a user would be pissed if I would have to > > install support for a system I don't use, while the system I use > > could be easily supported, but isn't. > > So we will add an amule-gnome-support package (Ubuntu already

Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

2010-01-05 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hi, Vollstrecker ha scritto: >> If we can add a gnome support, we should do it. > > And if we could add kde-support, we should do it? And if we could add > opera-support, we should do it? Why not? :-) > everything, but I as a user would be pissed if I would have to install > support for a sys