Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 schrieb Giuseppe Iuculano: > I don't know why you got criticized
For packages where payload and metainformation are nearly the same size. But that's another story. > , but there are many other > packages that provide gnome-support with few small files, see > iceweasel-gnome-support, xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support, > icedove-gnome-support, etc. I never said it's a bad idea. It's just that I don't like the way it should be solved. If we do it with a shemas-file, we get only some browsers, and we give a systemwide standard for a thing that users solved for agaes by themselfes on many different ways, which we don't know how, and which has alternative apps to handle. Like the mldonkey thing I mentioned. That's why you can't compare this with other gnome- support addons that just print a download finished message in desktop's native style. If you want to include such a thing, feel free to do so, I just suggest a different appraoch (and I am working in this, too). -- MfG usw. Vollstrecker registered Linuxuser: 295882
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
