Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:29:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> This bug will be fixed (or rather, worked around) once we have a
>> released version of sbuild supporting schroot, because it is then no
>> longer dependent upon the host to run apt-get.
>>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:29:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> This bug will be fixed (or rather, worked around) once we have a
> released version of sbuild supporting schroot, because it is then no
> longer dependent upon the host to run apt-get.
>
> However, all these merged bugs are due to apt-
This bug will be fixed (or rather, worked around) once we have a
released version of sbuild supporting schroot, because it is then no
longer dependent upon the host to run apt-get.
However, all these merged bugs are due to apt-listbugs not respecting
the APT configuration, and so IMHO these should
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:56:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> However, I am a bit worried that this might break sbuild on hurd-i386,
> >> as networking inside the chroot is AFAIK not known to work reliably on
> >> the Hurd, and users of sbuild have reported trouble with it (though
> >> perhaps
Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> The question rather is: Why does sbuild not run apt in the chroot? I
>> guess the answer is: "Because upstream's (i.e. the one used on the
>> official buildds) does not eithe
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The question rather is: Why does sbuild not run apt in the chroot? I
> guess the answer is: "Because upstream's (i.e. the one used on the
> official buildds) does not either, and there was no convincing argument
> to change it".
>
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:01:07PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > It is such that you do not need to have working apt-get/networking
> > inside the chroot. (the chroot typically only has Essential and
> > Build-Essential packages installed, which does not include apt-get
> > AFAIK)
>
> This may or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tags 270357 271031 -moreinfo
> tags 270357 271031 -unreproducible
> merge 270357 271031 310863
> thanks
>
> (I guess they are the same, unmerge if not)
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Roger Le
tags 270357 271031 -moreinfo
tags 270357 271031 -unreproducible
merge 270357 271031 310863
thanks
(I guess they are the same, unmerge if not)
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> sbuild uses the non-chrooted install of apt, rather than the copy
> installed inside the ch
merge 310863 271031
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.35
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> sbuild uses the non-chrooted install of apt, rather than the copy
> installed inside the chroot. I've not investigated why yet.
>
> If apt-li
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.35
Severity: normal
Hi,
sbuild uses the non-chrooted install of apt, rather than the copy
installed inside the chroot. I've not investigated why yet.
If apt-listbugs is installed, and requires human interaction before
unpacking, sbuild freezes. Removing apt-listbugs
11 matches
Mail list logo
