Bug#301898: libmpich1.0: no mpif90 executable created when

2008-11-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
fixed 301898 1.2.7-6 thanks Hi Michael, I believe that the fix to bug 195509 made gfortran work as the F77 and F90 compiler, so this should work now. If not, can you please reopen? [And please don't include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your reply -- unless you reopen the bug.] Thanks, Adam On Thu, 20

Bug#301898: libmpich1.0: no mpif90 executable created when

2005-03-31 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello and thank you for the report, On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 19:49 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Hello Dr. Powell, > > I believe that the required modifications are quite minor. I basically > copied mpif90 (this turns out to be a shell script) from the mpich source > directory. Then, i changed

Bug#301898: libmpich1.0: no mpif90 executable created when

2005-03-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hello Dr. Powell, I believe that the required modifications are quite minor. I basically copied mpif90 (this turns out to be a shell script) from the mpich source directory. Then, i changed the "includedir" and "libdir" lines to properly point to the mpich include and lib dirs. With that sli

Bug#301898: libmpich1.0: no mpif90 executable created when compiling deb package

2005-03-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
severity 301898 wishlist tags 301898 experimental thanks On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 20:05 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Package: libmpich1.0 > Version: 1.2.5.3-2 > Severity: important > > > i attempted to create a set of mpich debs using g95 as my > Fortran/Fortran 90 compiler, but the mpif90 execu

Bug#301898: libmpich1.0: no mpif90 executable created when compiling deb package

2005-03-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
Package: libmpich1.0 Version: 1.2.5.3-2 Severity: important i attempted to create a set of mpich debs using g95 as my Fortran/Fortran 90 compiler, but the mpif90 executable was not properly created. actually, it may have been compiled and linked, but it wasn't transfered to /usr/bin (i'll check