Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 26, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you explain, why pipe_decode breaks "spam processing scripts" ?
> >
> > If I unset pipe_decode, I will run into trouble with all of my
> > "processing scripts". And 'sa-learn' for exapmle works better
> > WITH pip
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-03-21 21:53:45, schrieb Bob Proulx:
> > Package: mutt
> > Version: 1.5.6-20040907+3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > When upgrading machines from woody to the current sarge snapshot the
> > change in pipe_decode setting breaks spam processing scripts. The upstream
>
On Mar 26, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you explain, why pipe_decode breaks "spam processing scripts" ?
>
> If I unset pipe_decode, I will run into trouble with all of my
> "processing scripts". And 'sa-learn' for exapmle works better
> WITH pipe_decode as without. Same for
Am 2005-03-21 21:53:45, schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.6-20040907+3
> Severity: normal
>
> When upgrading machines from woody to the current sarge snapshot the
> change in pipe_decode setting breaks spam processing scripts. The upstream
> binary does not set pipe_decode and th
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040907+3
Severity: normal
When upgrading machines from woody to the current sarge snapshot the
change in pipe_decode setting breaks spam processing scripts. The upstream
binary does not set pipe_decode and the woody version did not either. But
the current sarge sna
5 matches
Mail list logo
