Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 26, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you explain, why pipe_decode breaks "spam processing scripts" ? > > > > If I unset pipe_decode, I will run into trouble with all of my > > "processing scripts". And 'sa-learn' for exapmle works better > > WITH pipe_decode as without. Same for 'blacklister'. > > Actually I am not sure about this, recently I have been thinking about > reversing the default.
Please! Note also that this is not the upstream mutt default. This is a Debian specific packaging default. I am guessing that most Debian mutt users figure this out since they are mostly a smart bunch. Then they set this to be pipe_decode=no in their personal ~/.muttrc file to override the package default and then forget about it. However, every Debian stable user that upgrades (and uses sa-learn for example) will need to go through this learning process and to make these personal customizations. > Using sa-learn on decoded messages is surely a bad idea, because it will > lose a lot of important information (just think about > multipart/alternative messages). Agreed. Bob -- Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.proulx.com/~bob/ CP-ASEL-IA-Tailwheel-Glider
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
