Bug#299364: removing is not a regression

2005-03-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 23:33]: > [...] I had some discussion with upstream. Two results: 1. dietlibc is used for security reason. As vserver-utils are used to chroot into chroots where root is much less powerful, it might be a bad idea security wise to use glibc which could e

Bug#299364: removing is not a regression

2005-03-17 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, as just discussed on IRC: IMHO, removing the packages is ok, as with the version in sarge, all packages except on i386 are silently broken (see the RC-bug 291426 for details why). So, if the now not building archs are removed, the package is better than the version currently in sarge. Also, t