Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-05-03 Thread Alec Berryman
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. on 2005-04-29 09:55:33 -0700: > On 04/29/05 12:31, Alec Berryman wrote: > > I've fixed this issue in my working copy of > > rzip > > Which did you change, the man page or the code? Not exactly an answer to your question, but 6 is the default in CVS, and Tridge knows better

Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-04-29 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Hi Alec, Thanks for following up. rzip is a top performer, and if I recall correctly, Andrew Tridgell said it shouldn't be too hard to make rzip forward compressed data to stdout so it works as a filter! It seems to me that with its outstanding performance, if it also became a filter, rzip could

Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-04-29 Thread Alec Berryman
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. on 2005-04-28 13:58:02 -0700: > Here's a one liner shell script which agrees with > > $ rzip -h" > > that "6" is rzip's default compression level. Hi Kingsley, I've fixed this issue in my working copy of rzip; I've been waiting until I've finished #297701 (add long op

Bug#299327: Script to test for rzip's default compression level

2005-04-28 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Here's a one liner shell script which agrees with $ rzip -h" that "6" is rzip's default compression level. $ file=bash_completion ; rm /tmp/$file.rz ; rzip -k -o /tmp/$file.rz /etc/$file ; echo -n "D " ; du -b /tmp/$file.rz ; for l in $( seq 0 9 ) ; do rm /tmp/$file.rz; rzip -k -$l -o