On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:47:13PM +0100, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Dealing with the several inetd:s available is update-inetd's job and
> the fact that it doesn't handle at least xinetd is a bug that should
> be reported against netbase if it isn't already there. (I do not have
> net access to be
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:50:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Sure, patches are always welcome. The reason why non initd-configuration
> was done until now is, that it the configuration should not depend on
> one certain initd, but do some autodetection or whatever to work with
> all of the
Martin Samuelsson wrote:
It is my opinion that an appropriate line should be added to inetd.conf
to simplify configuration. Users don't want to spend time doing things
apt could to, and that has to be done with a package every time it is
installed.
Should I try providing a patch to help solving thi
Package: micro-httpd
Version: 20011214-1
Severity: wishlist
The package description suggests that this software is designed to start
from inetd.
"It runs from inetd, which means its performance is poor."
Any other inetd started software I can think of configures inetd when
the package is
4 matches
Mail list logo
