Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-31 Thread psz
[Re-sending: my message yesterday does not seem to have made it to b.d.u] Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, without checking I cannot tell it for true at 100%, but I believe > this bug is already corrected in current unstable/testing version (1.0.3). > Current woody backport [1]

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-24 Thread Ricardo Mones
forwarded 295435 Hiroyuki Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tags 295435 woody confirmed thanks On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:44:15 +1100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> ... bypassing the lazy m

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-23 Thread psz
Ricardo, > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> ... bypassing the lazy maintainer? > > And others happen to have a life with situations where free time drops > nearly to zero sometimes. But I guess is easier to think

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-23 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:14:45 -0500 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Justin, > > > > I am confused. You wrote: > > > > >> When do you expect it to be forwarded upstream? > > > Donno; that's up to the maintainer. If

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-22 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Justin, > > I am confused. You wrote: > > >> When do you expect it to be forwarded upstream? > > Donno; that's up to the maintainer. If you like, you can do it > > yourself. You should Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your message, >

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-22 Thread psz
Justin, I am confused. You wrote: >> When do you expect it to be forwarded upstream? > Donno; that's up to the maintainer. If you like, you can do it > yourself. You should Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your message, > which will get your message into the bts and also mark the bug as > "forwarded" t

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-22 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:38:39AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Indeed ... > > Thank you for verifying my report. > > > It would be easy to patch, except that whole function looks poorly > > written ... > > Agreed. > > > ... I will leave it tagged "upstream" and hope that the > > maintai

Bug#295435: mbox parser

2005-03-22 Thread psz
> Indeed ... Thank you for verifying my report. > It would be easy to patch, except that whole function looks poorly > written ... Agreed. > ... I will leave it tagged "upstream" and hope that the > maintainer forwards it there and that it is fixed properly. When do you expect it to be forward