Ricardo, > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> ... bypassing the lazy maintainer? > > And others happen to have a life with situations where free time drops > nearly to zero sometimes. But I guess is easier to think they're lazy.
The lazy comment was mine. I did not intend to offend, but rather to succintly describe the situation. I apologize for my choice of word: now I see how it did not convey the meaning I intended. > I'd better suggest to upgrade to a newer version. Given upstream is > currently focused on developing the 2.0 version and the availability of > much newer versions ported to woody, I don't think upstream is gonna take > care of this bug. We can only hope that this bug will be corrected in version 2. The response from Hiroyuki Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> seems to indicate that the bug is taken seriously: his view of correctness seems "skewed". > I don't mind at all, if the actions are correct and justified :) Thanks, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
