On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:57:54AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 18:41]:
> > > There are many ways to fix this bug.
> > This is true for many bugs. But when I ask myself "Is this bug bad
> >
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:57:54AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 18:41]:
> > There are many ways to fix this bug.
>
> This is true for many bugs. But when I ask myself "Is this bug bad
> enough that I will hold up the release for it", my honest answer is "
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 18:41]:
> There are many ways to fix this bug.
This is true for many bugs. But when I ask myself "Is this bug bad
enough that I will hold up the release for it", my honest answer is "I
don't think I would". This isn't the same as "nobody is allowed to fix
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> tags 295375 + etch-ignore
> thanks
>
> Just to say the obvious: With my authority as Release Manager, I say
> this bug is not release critical.
>
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 18:16]:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:55:
tags 295375 + etch-ignore
thanks
Just to say the obvious: With my authority as Release Manager, I say
this bug is not release critical.
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 18:16]:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:55:59PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > ... which happen to be built from the gpsd
tags 295375 - etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:55:59PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> tags 295375 + etch-ignore
> thanks
>
>
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 16:23]:
> > And once again you are wrong...
> >
> > The gpsd-clients binary package in etch also suffers from this
tags 295375 + etch-ignore
thanks
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 16:23]:
> And once again you are wrong...
>
> The gpsd-clients binary package in etch also suffers from this bug.
... which happen to be built from the gpsd source package. Sorry, I
don't see a reason why this is RC. (In
tags 295375 - etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:00:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> tags 295375 + etch-ignore
> thanks
>
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 15:50]:
> > Though this statement is true, that is not release critical *yet* -
> > because no such package has entere
tags 295375 + etch-ignore
thanks
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070120 15:50]:
> Though this statement is true, that is not release critical *yet* -
> because no such package has entered Debian yet.
> Since such a package was already in the archive when I raised the
> severity, Andreas' just
severity 295375 serious
thanks
Quoting Andreas Barth (who didn't Cc me, so I didn't see it earlier):
<-- snip -->
Though this statement is true, that is not release critical *yet* -
because no such package has entered Debian yet.
<-- snip -->
Since such a package was already in the archive
10 matches
Mail list logo