On 11/02/2005 Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> I still don't like the thought of having to add authentication to lurker...
> This should be apache's job. :-(
still true.
> First, allow 'dbdir' in the scope of a list configuration to override the
> public (global) 'dbdir' setting. This is taken relativ
On 11/02/2005 Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Huh? Why is that? Is the web cache directory hard-coded in the Lurker
> binary? Or what do you mean with "instance"? AFAIK Lurker hasn't been
> using a daemon for quite a while, if that's what you mean (but I guess you
> knew that). Now I'm confused.
as we
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:21:49PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > [...] you'll have to install seperate instances of lurkers binary to
> > configure different htdocs (webcache) directories as well. therefore i
> > see currently no possibility to run more than one lurker insta
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> [...] you'll have to install seperate instances of lurkers binary to
> configure different htdocs (webcache) directories as well. therefore i
> see currently no possibility to run more than one lurker instance with
> the debian lurker package installation.
Huh? Why is that?
On 08/02/2005 Julian Mehnle wrote:
> README.mailman says:
>
> | As long as lurker doesn't support multible databases per instance, you
> | have to archive either all private lists, all public lists or both with
> | lurker.
>
> I don't have any experience with older versions of lurker, but I see t
Package: lurker
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: minor
README.mailman says:
| As long as lurker doesn't support multible databases per instance, you
| have to archive either all private lists, all public lists or both with
| lurker.
I don't have any experience with older versions of lurker, but I see th
6 matches
Mail list logo
