Hi,
Did you see my last mail on this subject? The one including a fix for
PAGE_SIZE issue in minimal.c and replaces uname() with /proc/version in
version.c.
Are you ok with appliing the latest patch?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:16:55PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> >
> > It won't work without my patch. If this file is unneeded, why not just
> > removing it?
>
> It's convenient to ship everything together in one tarball.
> One might use minimal.c for a rescue disk or embedded system.
Well, t
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 19:32 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:25:20AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 00:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > I'm attaching two patches, one with the debian-specific changes and
> > > another
> > > with the upstream chan
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:25:20AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 00:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'm attaching two patches, one with the debian-specific changes and another
> > with the upstream changes. I think this addresses all your concerns about
> > my previous pa
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 00:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm attaching two patches, one with the debian-specific changes and another
> with the upstream changes. I think this addresses all your concerns about
> my previous patch.
There is simply no need to be patching minimal.c.
This file does n
I'm attaching two patches, one with the debian-specific changes and another
with the upstream changes. I think this addresses all your concerns about
my previous patch.
--
.''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S)
: :' :
`. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kf
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 21:27 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:35:39PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> >
> > Before long, it'll probably be added to the standard.
> > The last time around, SIGSYS was added.
> >
> > Just make the FreeBSD header files do this:
> >
> > #define
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:35:39PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
> Before long, it'll probably be added to the standard.
> The last time around, SIGSYS was added.
>
> Just make the FreeBSD header files do this:
>
> #define SIGPOLL 23
> #define SIGPWR 29
> #define SIGIO SIGPOLL
> #define SIGLOST
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 17:15 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:26:51AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > Eeew. The BSDisms in glibc never fail to sicken me.
> > I've noticed that signal() is broken (it should map
> > to the Linux system call, which correctly follows the
> > 7t
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:26:51AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 12:33 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:43PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
> > > In general I'm moving away from PAGE_SIZE, but I
> > > sure do wish to keep it in minimal.c. Note th
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 12:33 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:43PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > In general I'm moving away from PAGE_SIZE, but I
> > sure do wish to keep it in minimal.c. Note that
> > this file is not compiled in by default, and that
> > it already su
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:43PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Woah you're brave...
=)
> Adding a top-level common.h is wrong.
> See the proc/*.h files, including proc/procps.h.
Ah, I see.
> In general I'm moving away from PAGE_SIZE, but I
> sure do wish to keep it in minimal.c. Note that
>
Woah you're brave...
Adding a top-level common.h is wrong.
See the proc/*.h files, including proc/procps.h.
In general I'm moving away from PAGE_SIZE, but I
sure do wish to keep it in minimal.c. Note that
this file is not compiled in by default, and that
it already supports FreeBSD.
You should n
13 matches
Mail list logo
