Bug#290366: vga= parameter

2005-06-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:07:57AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Well, the installer docs do suggest passing vga=771 for machines with > display problems. Mostly these seem to be laptops there the vga16fb cuts > off part of the screen. > > I guess that we could try turing vga=0x301 (ie 769) on, or 771

Bug#290366: vga= parameter

2005-06-17 Thread Joey Hess
Well, the installer docs do suggest passing vga=771 for machines with display problems. Mostly these seem to be laptops there the vga16fb cuts off part of the screen. I guess that we could try turing vga=0x301 (ie 769) on, or 771 on by default in unstable now and see what breaks. Don't know enough