Bug#285135: Remove from sarge

2005-03-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:34:07PM -0800, David Schleef wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:18:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Having this bug fixed in unstable doesn't do us any good for sarge if it's > > been replaced by a package that can't be built from source. Why does > > swf-player ne

Bug#285135: Remove from sarge

2005-03-22 Thread David Schleef
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:18:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Having this bug fixed in unstable doesn't do us any good for sarge if it's > been replaced by a package that can't be built from source. Why does > swf-player need liboil0.3? Older versions of swfdec used liboil-0.2. The current v

Bug#285135: Remove from sarge

2005-03-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:41:22PM -0800, David Schleef wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > > > These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it > > > into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. > > > > So should swf-player be removed from sarge?

Bug#285135: Remove from sarge

2005-03-22 Thread David Schleef
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > > These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it > > into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. > > So should swf-player be removed from sarge? No, why? It's fixed in sid. (Did I put the wrong tag on it?) dave...

Bug#285135: Remove from sarge

2005-03-22 Thread Thomas Hood
> These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it > into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW. So should swf-player be removed from sarge? -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL