On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:18:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Having this bug fixed in unstable doesn't do us any good for sarge if it's > been replaced by a package that can't be built from source. Why does > swf-player need liboil0.3?
Older versions of swfdec used liboil-0.2. The current version uses 0.3, because it is ABI-stable. There have been a lot of annoying bugs fixed in recent swfdec releases; it would be nice to get these into sarge. I'm merely waiting patiently for liboil-0.3 to get into sid. I'm told it should be processed in a few days. dave... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
