> desktop-file-validate does not do full checks and seem to lack behind
> the specification (for me it seems, it misses active maintenance).
What make you think that? There is no upstream bug open at the moment,
changes have been commited on 2007-08-18 and the changelog mentions
"updated to deskto
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:02:11AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > Opinions?
> >
> > The indirect dependency on libglib isn't really ideal...
>
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Opinions?
>
> The indirect dependency on libglib isn't really ideal...
> Although the to have the check would be good. Not 100% sure yet.
A lot already d
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I like the idea, it should be able to get to work quite simply, but it
> would introduce a new dependency, and render lintian not directly
> installable on woody (
Hi,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Fri, Jan 14, 2005:
> I like the idea, it should be able to get to work quite simply, but it
> would introduce a new dependency, and render lintian not directly
> installable on woody (but you'd need to backport desktop-file-validate).
Yeah
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>Hi,
>
> It would be nice if lintian could check .desktop files with the
> desktop-file-validate tool of package desktop-file-utils, or perform a
> similar check. This would prevent bugs like #275968 to happen.
I like the idea,
6 matches
Mail list logo
