On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > I like the idea, it should be able to get to work quite simply, but it > would introduce a new dependency, and render lintian not directly > installable on woody (but you'd need to backport desktop-file-validate).
lintian isn't installable directly anymore anyway as there is no intltool-debian in woody (noticed the problem while testing 1.23.7 on lintian.d.o but didn't worked around it yet). > For lintian.d.o a bit more work, but I don't think it's really > prohibitive, plus sarge is going to be release soon :). > > Opinions? The indirect dependency on libglib isn't really ideal... Although the to have the check would be good. Not 100% sure yet. Perhaps we should go back to only recommending some external tools... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
