> Perhaps the correct thing to do is just mark gpsbabel as incompatible
> on arm.
Until someone that's really familiar with Arm and the issues on it is
willing to help tackle it, that may be appropriate.
Only the systems with FP that looke IEEE-ish will have even a fighting
chance.
RJL
--
To
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:44:36PM -0600, Robert Lipe wrote:
> > If my memory is any good, arm, or atleast one of the debian
> > arches, does not support floating point on the CPU and it's
> > implemented in the kernel.
>
> I remember when systems like that roamed the earth.
>
> > There are sev
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 07:38:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:57:22PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I know that arm is weird in some respect wrt floating-point, but I don't
> > know a whole lot about it. I think though that sizeof(whatever) there
> > is pretty similar
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:57:22PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > > > And on arm:
> [snip]
> >
> > This is something in the MXF format. I don't see that on Alpha. My gut
> > tells me it's another silly sizeof(something) problem.
>
> I know that arm is weird in some respect wrt floating-point
> If my memory is any good, arm, or atleast one of the debian
> arches, does not support floating point on the CPU and it's
> implemented in the kernel.
I remember when systems like that roamed the earth.
> There are several implemtations of this where one is slow but correct
> and an other tha
> > This looks like a timezone problem I fixed in psitrext back in Oct of 03
> > but it might be needed the 'FREEZE_TIME' fix I applied in April of 04.
>
> Hmm, would that have escaped 1.2.4 somehow?
Hmmm. Should be there. Let's knock these down a few at a time.
> > (Apparently this system d
> This was all with the latest version in Debian which is 1.2.4.
I'll encourage you to go with what's in the top of tree. I've been
meaning to spin a release but just haven't found the time.
> However, most things in are also available in things
> like on most systems but not all of them are.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:31:25PM -0600, Robert Lipe wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > 've received some more information about failures to build gpsbabel.
> > Kurt Roeckx provided some helpful data.
>
> It's not entirely clear which version of GPSBabel is in question here.
This was all with
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:31:25PM -0600, Robert Lipe wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > 've received some more information about failures to build gpsbabel.
> > Kurt Roeckx provided some helpful data.
>
> It's not entirely clear which version of GPSBabel is in question here.
Sorry. It's 1.2.
John Goerzen wrote:
> 've received some more information about failures to build gpsbabel.
> Kurt Roeckx provided some helpful data.
It's not entirely clear which version of GPSBabel is in question here.
> What can we do to help you debug the problem?
Can you provide an account on failing sys
Robert,
've received some more information about failures to build gpsbabel.
Kurt Roeckx provided some helpful data. What can we do to help you
debug the problem?
(See http://bugs.debian.org/273005 for a history on this)
Thanks,
John
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
The package is now failing to build on all arches except m68k,
and they don't all fail in the same way.
On powerpc, hppa, s390, mips, mipsel:
./testo
51c51
< B0421143040679S15036423EA00
---
> B0421143040678S15036423EA00
ERROR comparing /tmp/gpsbabel.1531/igc_sed.out
reference/
12 matches
Mail list logo
