On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:54:14AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> I did the "new upstream", so I can tell you that it was only a couple of
> lines of code changes, and they were tested well before being put into the
> silo repo.
> I don't think it needs extensive testing.
It seems that this version
I did the "new upstream", so I can tell you that it was only a couple of
lines of code changes, and they were tested well before being put into the
silo repo.
I don't think it needs extensive testing.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:34:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:30:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:30:55AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
> bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
> with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
> testing by others
Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
testing by others first).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:54:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wr
4 matches
Mail list logo
