Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without testing by others first).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:54:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > severity 261824 important > severity 267428 important > thanks > > Time's up, folks; if no fix has been found yet for these bootloader bugs, > they'll have to remain hardware-specific errata for sarge. They will no > longer be allowed to block the release, since silo still works on the > majority of sparc hardware. > > Someone should, however, document these problems for the install manual > and/or d-i errata. > > If someone can determine one way or another whether the gcc-2.95 rebuild > actually fixes the problem on Ultra5 for someone other than Geert, that > would help me in deciding whether an NMU is warranted. > > Thanks, > -- > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
