Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > > well there is a special response protocol shared by rrd_info
> > > rrd_graphv and rrd_updatev ... this could be handled by RRD
Hi Sebastian,
Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > > > Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at
Hi Tobi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > > Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > > > > Otherwh
Hi Sebastian,
Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > > > Otherwhise the solution is simple, update the docs and mention
Hi,
(This is a follow-up to Debian bug report #251701 [1]. The text also
mentions bug report #182217, which can be found at [2].)
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/251701
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/182217
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:20:18PM +0200, Robert Lindgren wrote:
> Package: librrdp-perl
> Version
5 matches
Mail list logo