On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:47:22 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Ok. Easiest way would be if I had write access to SVN. Could you
> > please (ass current member of the team) get in touch with the Alioth
> > admins to figure out what's wrong?
>
> I've fixed the permissions. Try again p
Coin,
Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. Easiest way would be if I had write access to SVN. Could you please
> (ass current member of the team) get in touch with the Alioth admins to
> figure out what's wrong?
BTW, i do request the same access as i'm in the Team too, and as
coop
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:35:46 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Probably I used a custom make target with a (later?)
> > package-specific rule depending on it, and then at some point moved
> > to the current setup but forgot to remove the now unnecessary
> > cleanup. I'll
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Probably I used a custom make target with a (later?) package-specific
> rule depending on it, and then at some point moved to the current
> setup but forgot to remove the now unnecessary cleanup. I'll check,
> and simplify the snippet if that's the case.
At this point, I
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:10:36 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Attached is the cdbs snippet I already use and have used for some
> > time now. It invokes dh_buildinfo as late as possible (we only want
> > it for inclusion in actual packaging - not while iterating over
> >
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Attached is the cdbs snippet I already use and have used for some
> time now. It invokes dh_buildinfo as late as possible (we only want
> it for inclusion in actual packaging - not while iterating over other
> build issues locally), and makes sure to only invoke once.
I'm
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question is not so much about whether it is dead or not, but how
> one would integrate it into cdbs. One way to address it manually is:
>
> binary::
> dh_buildinfo
>
> (or some other target -- I'm not sure).
>
> The alternative of a prope
Marc Dequènes wrote:
> How can you say it's dead ? Dirson uploaded a fixed package in
> february (after a long time without any work, i agree), so even if it
> is not well maintained, it may still be of interrest. Did you talk to
> Dirson to know about his plans ?
The question is not so much about
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, this bug was reopened, but what are we going to do about it? As far
> as I can tell, dh-buildinfo is dead, and there is no technically
> reasonable way to integrate it into cdbs. What's the plan?
How can you say it's dead ? Dirson uploaded a
OK, this bug was reopened, but what are we going to do about it? As far
as I can tell, dh-buildinfo is dead, and there is no technically
reasonable way to integrate it into cdbs. What's the plan?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
10 matches
Mail list logo
