Hi Xavier,
Thanks for answering so fast after so many years. Are you ok with me
closing the bug now?
Greetings
Marc
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 03:43:45PM +0200, xpoins...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> We don't have the machine anymore.
> Sorry.
>
> Best regards,
> Xavier.
>
> Le 21/10/2017 à 13:
Hi Marc,
We don't have the machine anymore.
Sorry.
Best regards,
Xavier.
Le 21/10/2017 à 13:17, Marc Haber a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> this is Debian bug #152203. You were able to do checks on sparc64 back
> in 2008. The underlying bug in libmhash was fixed in the mean time. Are
> you still in the situa
Hi,
this is Debian bug #152203. You were able to do checks on sparc64 back
in 2008. The underlying bug in libmhash was fixed in the mean time. Are
you still in the situation to try things on sparc 64?
If so, it would be great if you would be able and willing to verify that
aide works now even wit
block #152203 with #429180
thanks
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:19:22PM +0100, Xavier Poinsard wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> It works.
Blocking this bug appropriately.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Compu
Thanks,
It works.
Marc Haber a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Xavier Poinsard wrote:
>
>> unarchive 152203
>> reopen 152203 !
>> found 0.13.1-2
>> # Just reproduced this bug with etch on a sparc64 machine.
>>
>
> Please try disabling the whirlpool hash. This may be an
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Xavier Poinsard wrote:
> unarchive 152203
> reopen 152203 !
> found 0.13.1-2
> # Just reproduced this bug with etch on a sparc64 machine.
Please try disabling the whirlpool hash. This may be an mhash issue,
see #429180.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
6 matches
Mail list logo