Hi, thanks.
Timo Röhling writes ("Re: dpkg-source, native source package format with
non-native version"):
> Dimitri argues that the native package format is useful even for
> non-native packages
...
> If I have mispresented or omitted important facts, please do not
> hesitate to correct me.
I
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi,
as per
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte/-/blob/master/procedures/moderation.md
I am assuming the moderator role for this TC bug.
I'm going to summarize the state of this bug and the original bug
against dpkg as I have read up on it:
On 2025-05-27 20:48:30 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher writes ("Re: Bug#1106402: dpkg-source, native source
> package format with non-native version"):
> > NACK, it's way too late into the freeze. Toolchain freeze (which dpkg
> > belongs to) star
Matthew Vernon writes ("Re: Bug#1106402: dpkg-source, native source package
format with non-native version"):
> I think Ian is right that we could declare as he wishes under 6.1.1 that:
>
>dpkg-source should be able to build "3.0 (native)" source packages
&
Sebastian Ramacher writes ("Re: Bug#1106402: dpkg-source, native source package
format with non-native version"):
> NACK, it's way too late into the freeze. Toolchain freeze (which dpkg
> belongs to) started on 2025-03-15.
Of course the final decision is with the Release Tea
On 2025-05-27 19:44:52 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For reference, the resolution in #1007717 was:
>
> """
> Therefore, using its powers
> under constitution 6.1.5, the Technical Committee issues the following
> advice:
>
> 1. It is not a bug of any severity for a package with a non-
Hi,
For reference, the resolution in #1007717 was:
"""
Therefore, using its powers
under constitution 6.1.5, the Technical Committee issues the following
advice:
1. It is not a bug of any severity for a package with a non-native
version number to use a native source package format.
2.
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> I would like the Technical Committee to explicitly use its
Ian> power in Constitution 6.1 (1) "Decide on any matter of
Ian> technical policy" to decide that:
Ian, thanks so much for pushing this forward.
I support Ian's request, his reasoning
Package: tech-ctte
Control: tags 737634 patch
Control: block 737634 by -1
Hi.
I would like the Technical Committee to explicitly use its power in
Constitution 6.1 (1) "Decide on any matter of technical policy"
to decide that:
dpkg-source should be able to build "3.0 (native)" source packages
9 matches
Mail list logo
