Hi,
Santiago wrote:
> While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
> to alternative implementation, I think it is too late now to ask for
> the removal of isc-dhcp, being so close to release trixie.
I very much agree with the above.
Sebastian wrote:
> Except for fai-qu
On Thu, 22 May 2025 20:46:34 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Sebastian,
I'm a bit surprised about the timing of the removal, is this the final
call about the severity from Release Team?
What is the default replacement for the client? and for the server?
I look
El 22/05/25 a las 20:34, Bastian Blank escribió:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:04:43PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > "The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm
> > lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable
> > release, see bug #10
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:37:11AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:04:43PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
> to alternative impleme
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:04:43PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
> > to alternative implementation,
>
> What is the alternative implementation for isc-dhcp
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:04:43PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
to alternative implementation,
What is the alternative implementation for isc-dhcp-relay?
Greetings
Marc
--
---
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2025-05-22 15:04:43 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió:
> > Source: isc-dhcp
> > Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
> > Severity: serious
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: wa...@debian.org
> >
> > isc-dhcp is
On 2025-05-22 20:46:34 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2025-05-22 15:04:43 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 important
> >
> > El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió:
> > > Source: isc-dhcp
> > > Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
> > >
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:04:43PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> "The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm
> lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable
> release, see bug #1035972 (isc-dhcp EOL'ed) for more details."
> That doesn't
Control: severity -1 important
El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió:
> Source: isc-dhcp
> Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: wa...@debian.org
>
> isc-dhcp is EOL and marked as not security supported. It should not be
> released with trixie.
>
> See
> https://list
Source: isc-dhcp
Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: wa...@debian.org
isc-dhcp is EOL and marked as not security supported. It should not be
released with trixie.
See
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2022-October/022786.html
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
11 matches
Mail list logo
