On 2025-05-22 20:46:34 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On 2025-05-22 15:04:43 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > > > El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió: > > > Source: isc-dhcp > > > Version: 4.4.3-P1-7 > > > Severity: serious > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: wa...@debian.org > > > > > > isc-dhcp is EOL and marked as not security supported. It should not be > > > released with trixie. > > > > > > See > > > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2022-October/022786.html > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035972 > > > > > > Bastian > > > > While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate > > to alternative implementation, I think it is too late now to ask for the > > removal of isc-dhcp, being so close to release trixie. > > > > It is to note that, TTBOMK, there is currently no substitute for > > isc-dhcp-relay. > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#deprecated-components > > reads: > > > > "The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm > > lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable > > release, see bug #1035972 (isc-dhcp EOL'ed) for more details." > > > > That doesn't mean that it will be remove in trixie. > > It's dead. Except for fai-quickstart all reverse dependencies have MRs.
Okay, only libguestfs has a MR. But still … > I am all for getting it removed. > > Cheers > -- > Sebastian Ramacher -- Sebastian Ramacher
