El 16/4/25 a las 12:23, Jochen Sprickerhof escribió:
* Santiago Vila [2025-04-16 11:40]:
Yes, that's clear, but the question is "why?".
Because of:
https://sources.debian.org/src/autopkgtest/5.48/setup-commands/setup-testbed/
installs dpkg-dev and that pulls in make. Note that not all autop
* Santiago Vila [2025-04-16 11:40]:
Yes, that's clear, but the question is "why?".
Because of:
https://sources.debian.org/src/autopkgtest/5.48/setup-commands/setup-testbed/
installs dpkg-dev and that pulls in make. Note that not all autopkgtest
backends use setup-testbed.
Also see: https:
El 16/4/25 a las 11:05, Jochen Sprickerhof escribió:
The set of packages installed by default depends on the autopkgtest backend and
can change as different backends serve different purposes (a test of a full
desktop or boot loader needs a different test system then just running a
command, als
* Santiago Vila [2025-04-16 10:54]:
Hi. Thanks for the report, but I'm confused.
Why do the tests pass in both ci.debian.net and Salsa CI?
Are you saying that those autopkgtest implementations are buggy?
Note: This is a genuine question, and I'm open to "yes" being the
answer, but I would pref
Hi. Thanks for the report, but I'm confused.
Why do the tests pass in both ci.debian.net and Salsa CI?
Are you saying that those autopkgtest implementations are buggy?
Note: This is a genuine question, and I'm open to "yes" being the
answer, but I would prefer some reference. It could be a kind
Source: hello
Version: 2.10-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi Santiago,
could you please upload the attached patch to unstable? See it's
description for more information.
Cheers Jochen
0001-Add-autopkgtest-dependency-on-make.patch
Description: application/mbox
6 matches
Mail list logo
