Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > > Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to
> > > rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g.
> > > we cou
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to
> rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g.
> we could remove the shared library.
It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild.
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:41:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > >
On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.de
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > nmu coot_1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev"
Why is this needed?
Che
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev"
7 matches
Mail list logo