Bug#1091201: sqv: Consider building with OpenSSL

2025-04-18 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:20:09PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > This is a very reasonable request you'd think so, yet it was a reasonable choice to choose nettle over openssl. > and I strongly support it to be > implemented for trixie. Having two libraries less in the base system is > a welco

Bug#1091201: sqv: Consider building with OpenSSL

2025-04-18 Thread Alexander Kjäll
Hi I think that this is the correct thing to do. Only reason I haven't done it is a lack of free time. //Alex On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 14:20 Bastian Germann wrote: > Hi, > > This is a very reasonable request and I strongly support it to be > implemented for trixie. Having two libraries less in t

Bug#1091201: sqv: Consider building with OpenSSL

2025-04-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2024-12-23 13:20:44 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > APT now build with OpenSSL (and sqv), hence sqv is the only thing > left pulling in nettle in the base system. FWIW, i have more confidence in Nettle as a cryptographic backend than i have in OpenSSL. If the project as a whole prefers

Bug#1091201: sqv: Consider building with OpenSSL

2025-04-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi, This is a very reasonable request and I strongly support it to be implemented for trixie. Having two libraries less in the base system is a welcome improvement. Uploaders, would you be okay with this being implemented? Thanks, Bastian

Bug#1091201: sqv: Consider building with OpenSSL

2024-12-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: sqv Version: 1.2.1-3ubuntu1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org APT now build with OpenSSL (and sqv), hence sqv is the only thing left pulling in nettle in the base system. In Ubuntu I applied the following lines: override_dh_auto_install: dh_auto_install -- --features=