Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-29 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Hi Jonas, On 29/10/2024 11:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 18:50:10) >> On 26/10/2024 17:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 15:39:47) I was able to install the new version (0.12-5) on Debian Sid, but it is currently not

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 18:50:10) > On 26/10/2024 17:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 15:39:47) > >> I was able to install the new version (0.12-5) on Debian Sid, but it > >> is currently not possible to install the previous one (0.12-4) > >> because

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 18:56:51) > On 26/10/2024 18:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-10-26 17:01:57) > >> [...] you just lean back now [and] I take over > > > > The git contains only 10 git commits, and seems to smell badly of > > sponsor promotion (regar

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Matthieu Baerts
On 26/10/2024 17:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 15:39:47) >> I was able to install the new version (0.12-5) on Debian Sid, but it >> is currently not possible to install the previous one (0.12-4) >> because of the break in libell0. And on Debian testing, it is n

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Matthieu Baerts
On 26/10/2024 18:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-10-26 17:01:57) >> [...] you just lean back now [and] I take over > > The git contains only 10 git commits, and seems to smell badly of > sponsor promotion (regardless of legitimacy of the mission of said > sponsor). So

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-10-26 17:01:57) > [...] you just lean back now [and] I take over The git contains only 10 git commits, and seems to smell badly of sponsor promotion (regardless of legitimacy of the mission of said sponsor). That is a problem narrowly for this release because the gi

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 15:39:47) > I was able to install the new version (0.12-5) on Debian Sid, but it > is currently not possible to install the previous one (0.12-4) > because of the break in libell0. And on Debian testing, it is not > possible to install the new version, because

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Hi Jonas, On 26/10/2024 14:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 14:01:08) >> On 10/09/2024 08:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Sorry, I messed up: libell dropped a few symbols with release 0.69, >>> and I sloppily assumed it was old obsolete ones unused anywhere - >>>

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Matthieu, Quoting Matthieu Baerts (2024-10-26 14:01:08) > On 10/09/2024 08:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Sorry, I messed up: libell dropped a few symbols with release 0.69, > > and I sloppily assumed it was old obsolete ones unused anywhere - > > without thoroughly checking that assumption.

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-10-26 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Hi Jonas, On 10/09/2024 08:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Source: mptcpd > Version: 0.12-4 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Sorry, I messed up: libell dropped a few symbols with release 0.69, and > I sloppily assumed it was old obsol

Bug#1081265: does not support ELL 0.69

2024-09-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Source: mptcpd Version: 0.12-4 Severity: important Tags: upstream -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry, I messed up: libell dropped a few symbols with release 0.69, and I sloppily assumed it was old obsolete ones unused anywhere