Bug#1075868: ncbi-vdb: FTBFS with MbedTLS 3.6

On Mon Oct 21, 2024 at 11:40 PM CEST, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Indeed, all is well under 3.6.1 and for that matter under last Tuesday's 3.6.2 release. Nice to hear that! (NB: I tested both fully as is for simplicity, without any Debian patches; I'd be shocked if they led to any regressions on thi

Bug#1075868: ncbi-vdb: FTBFS with MbedTLS 3.6

"Andrea Pappacoda" writes: > I suspect this is related to > , which has been fixed > upstream in version 3.6.1 with > . Indeed, all is well under 3.6.1 and for that matter under last Tuesday's 3.6.

Bug#1075868: ncbi-vdb: FTBFS with MbedTLS 3.6

Hi Aaron, On Mon Oct 21, 2024 at 6:14 AM CEST, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Oops, arranging to use system Mbed TLS 3.6 in lieu of vendored 3.2.1 didn't work out quite as well as I'd initially thought, with builds succeeding but actual usage attempts failing. AFAICT, we need to add a call to psa_crypt

Bug#1075868: ncbi-vdb: FTBFS with MbedTLS 3.6

Oops, arranging to use system Mbed TLS 3.6 in lieu of vendored 3.2.1 didn't work out quite as well as I'd initially thought, with builds succeeding but actual usage attempts failing. AFAICT, we need to add a call to psa_crypto_init and make other tuneups TBD. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alu

Bug#1075868: ncbi-vdb: FTBFS with MbedTLS 3.6

Source: ncbi-vdb Version: 3.0.2+dfsg-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Control: fixed -1 3.0.9+dfsg-1 Control: block 1074248 by -1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! As you already know, I'm working on transitioning to MbedTLS 3.6. You've already uploaded a version of ncbi-vdb on