Adam,
On Monday, September 16, 2024 10:31:48 AM MST Adam Danischewski wrote:
> Hi Soren,
>
> I missed a few comments, sorry about that. I've updated the version on the
> upstream to reflect the debian version and added the doc file.
>
> The other comments were addressed as far as I know, if ther
Hi Soren,
I missed a few comments, sorry about that. I've updated the version on the
upstream to reflect the debian version and added the doc file.
The other comments were addressed as far as I know, if there is anything
else please let me know.
Latest (1.12) is uploaded to mentors.
Thanks,
+A
Adam,
Did you read over the several other comments?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076655#152
On Monday, September 16, 2024 8:42:09 AM MST Adam Danischewski wrote:
> Hi Soren,
>
> Last I heard, you asked for me to remove the debian/files file from Salsa.
> I did and responde
I removed the file via phone (1st time, hopefully it worked).
[Adam Danischewski - Chat @
Spike](https://spikenow.com/r/a/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=2rh5kr)
[2rh5kr]
On September 8, 2024 at 3:12 GMT, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Adam,
One additional comment:
Your source tree contains a de
Adam,
One additional comment:
Your source tree contains a debian/files. This is an autogenerated file
created
(and deleted) during build. Running sbuild removes it, but to be clean you
should probably remove it from Salsa.
See:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#gener
Adam,
Debian/copyright must specify a license for each entry. The one for debian/*
is missing.
W: bashbro source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright License [debian/copyright:
10]
N:
N: The paragraph in the machine readable copyright file is missing a field
N: that is required by the specific
Adam,
Thank you for going into detail on these. I find your analysis and examples to
be persuasive.
As I mentioned in a previous email, I think it would be easier to maintain the
Debian package if the packaging repository were converted to the gbp format.
However, doing so is not a requireme
Adam,
Thank you for your response below. I have comments on three subjects.
1.
Some people feel that programs should not be accepted to Debian if they aren’t
unique enough or if they are too ambitious. Although I feel this is an
important question for an upstream developer to ask themselves,
Here is my response to John:
Thanks for the thoughtful and quick response.
It looks like python -m http.server does cover most of what Bashbro has to
offer at the moment.
But there is a big update on the way, adding more functionality and I will
look at your security concerns.
Some of the featu
Hello,
Adam recently contacted me as a random DD, as he was interested in
getting Bashbro into Debian. As a courtesy to the others that have
visited with him about it, here is an excerpt of my response.
Hi Adam,
That's a pretty neat concept! I'm impressed - HTTP serving in bash. It
wouldn't h
10 matches
Mail list logo
