I removed the file via phone (1st time, hopefully it worked). [Adam Danischewski - Chat @ Spike](https://spikenow.com/r/a/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=2rh5kr) [2rh5kr]
On September 8, 2024 at 3:12 GMT, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote: Adam, One additional comment: Your source tree contains a debian/files. This is an autogenerated file created (and deleted) during build. Running sbuild removes it, but to be clean you should probably remove it from Salsa. See: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#generated-files-list-debian-files On Saturday, September 7, 2024 8:02:46 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > Adam, > > Debian/copyright must specify a license for each entry. The one for debian/ * > is missing. > > W: bashbro source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright License [debian/copyright: > 10] > N: > N: The paragraph in the machine readable copyright file is missing a field > N: that is required by the specification. > N: > N: Please refer to > N: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for > N: details. > N: > N: Visibility: warning > N: Show-Always: no > N: Check: debian/copyright/dep5 > > You can see an example at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/ copyright? > ref_type=heads > > > You should add the following two lines to debian/control, which specify the > location of the packaging repository. > > Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro.git > Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro > > You can see an example at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/control? > ref_type=heads > > > As the upstream README.md has important information for end users, you might > want to install it into /usr/share/doc/bashbro. You can do this by creating a > file named debian/docs and populating it with the single line: > > README.md > > Beyond the files dh_installdocs automatically installs, it will look for those > listed in debian/docs and install them into /usr/share/doc/bashbro. > > > This isn’t a problem for the packaging, but the upstream lists version 1.05 in > the header. It is fine to upload the Debian package that way, but you > probably want to either update the version number in the header with each > release or remove it. > > On Saturday, September 7, 2024 6:24:14 PM MST Adam Danischewski wrote: > > Hi Soren, > > > > If you could build it from the current repo that would be great! > > > > If there are any problems please let me know - I'll address them as soon as > > possible. > > > > Thanks, > > > > +Ad -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
