Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

2024-07-29 Thread fanpeng
Sorry it took so long to reply. Because I need to rebuild many libghc-* packages. With ghc-9.6.5-1~exp1, the error of R_LARCH_B26 overflowing also happened. So can we change the options for loong64? On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:01:13 +0800 zhangdandan wrote: > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rul

Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

2024-06-01 Thread zhangdandan
Hi maintainer, Sorry for my delayed reply. On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:01:37 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:23AM, Peng Fan wrote: > > The reason for the above error is that "relocation R_LARCH_B26 overflow > I assume ghc 9.4.7 that you currently have in loong64 is

Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

2024-06-01 Thread fanpeng
On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:01:37 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: Yes, that's unregisterised. I'll try ghc 9.6.7-1~exp1 lately. > Hi! > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:23AM, Peng Fan wrote: > > The reason for the above error is that "relocation R_LARCH_B26 overflow > > .." occurs during static linkin

Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

2024-05-17 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Hi! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:23AM, Peng Fan wrote: > The reason for the above error is that "relocation R_LARCH_B26 overflow > .." occurs during static linking in the test-pandoc stage. > Currently we have a verified method, don't need to skip test cases to solve > "relocation R_LARCH_B26 >

Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

2024-05-15 Thread Peng Fan
Package: ghc Version: 9.4.7-1+loong64.1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 Dear maintainers, Compiling the haskell-pandoc failed for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building environment. The error log is as follows, ``` [58 of 58] Li