On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:01:37 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
Yes, that's unregisterised. I'll try ghc 9.6.7-1~exp1 lately.
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:23AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > The reason for the above error is that "relocation R_LARCH_B26 overflow
> > ......" occurs during static linking in the test-pandoc stage.
> > Currently we have a verified method, don't need to skip test cases
to solve "relocation R_LARCH_B26
> > overflow ......" during static linking.
> > The verified method is as follows,
> > We need to add extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64 to
increase jump-instructions's range.
>
> I assume ghc 9.4.7 that you currently have in loong64 is unregisterised.
> Can you please run 'ghc --info' to confirm that?
>
> If that's the case, can you please try with ghc 9.6.7-1~exp1 from
> experimental? I have done some extra work there in order to get a
> registerised compiler on loong64.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Ilias
>
>
