Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 6:07 AM Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > > Still, I'm happy that you agree with my proposal. I'll take a look now; > it's been a while. Thanks for the upload, and now it hit testing! Can you kindly move the new repo to team's git repo? - https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-tea

Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Hi Roger! On Sun Mar 23, 2025 at 8:19 AM CET, Roger Shimizu wrote: - - The rules don't risk being removed from testing because of bugs in the SDK package or its dependencies (which is currently the case) Thanks for the report! I agree with above point. If you can create the package and upload

Bug#1069820: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Control: block -1 by 1101136 Hi Hans, On Sun Mar 23, 2025 at 3:26 PM CET, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Congrats on becoming a DD, great to have you! Thanks :D I also support your proposal, sounds like the best approach for maintaining udev rules. I'm also ready to review anything. I've

Bug#1069820: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 8:41 AM CET, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I reviewed the package, I think you should upload it to unstable ASAP. We can then work on polishing it. Ok, just pushed to NEW! I've opened an ITP as Bug #1101136. You can see the source code here:

Bug#1069820: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Andrea Pappacoda: Control: block -1 by 1101136 Hi Hans, On Sun Mar 23, 2025 at 3:26 PM CET, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Congrats on becoming a DD, great to have you! Thanks :D I also support your proposal, sounds like the best approach for maintaining udev rules.  I'm also ready to re

Bug#1069820: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Andrea Pappacoda: Hi Roger! On Sun Mar 23, 2025 at 8:19 AM CET, Roger Shimizu wrote: - - The rules don't risk being removed from testing because of bugs in the SDK package or its dependencies (which is currently the case) Thanks for the report! I agree with above point. If you can create th

Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

> - - The rules don't risk being removed from testing because of bugs in the SDK > package or its dependencies (which is currently the case) Thanks for the report! I agree with above point. If you can create the package and upload to mentors, I can sponsor upload to sid. -Roger

Bug#1069820: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Hello, I like the idea. It would also be useful for those using google-android-*- installer packages. May I suggest using this line in Build-Depends instead of only systemd-dev? systemd-dev (>= 253-3~) | udev (<< 253-3~), It would permit to build your package also on bookworm and previous relea

Bug#1069820: android-sdk-meta: Split udev rules in separate package

Source: android-sdk-meta Version: 28.0.2+10 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, thanks for your work on the android-sdk! Would you consider splitting the udev rules currently shipped in the android- sdk-platform-tools-common into a separate source p