Bug#1024616: libcrypt1: abuses Important and Protected fields

2023-06-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2022-11-22 17:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 22, Helmut Grohne wrote: > >> Shared libraries must not be marked Important: yes nor Protected: yes, >> because that prevents them from being removed in a multiarch setup. >> Please stop issuing these fields. >> >> I do see that they were ad

Bug#1024616: libcrypt1: abuses Important and Protected fields

2022-11-22 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 22, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Shared libraries must not be marked Important: yes nor Protected: yes, > because that prevents them from being removed in a multiarch setup. > Please stop issuing these fields. > > I do see that they were added to ease the upgrade from buster to > bullseye. I th

Bug#1024616: libcrypt1: abuses Important and Protected fields

2022-11-22 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: libxcrypt Version: 1:4.4.33-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap X-Debbugs-Cc: Ivo De Decker Shared libraries must not be marked Important: yes nor Protected: yes, because that prevents them from being removed in a multiarch setup. Please stop i