On 2022-11-22 17:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 22, Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote:
>
>> Shared libraries must not be marked Important: yes nor Protected: yes,
>> because that prevents them from being removed in a multiarch setup.
>> Please stop issuing these fields.
>>
>> I do see that they were added to ease the upgrade from buster to
>> bullseye. I think that the harm caused by the field now outweighs its
>> benefits.
> I suppose that I can remove them at this point, I will do it in the next
> upload.
Looks like you forgot to do so in the recent 1:4.4.35-1 upload.
Meanwhile, users are noticing that it is difficult to remove a foreign
architecture[1].
Thanks for maintaining libxcrypt! :-)
Cheers,
Sven
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/06/msg00448.html
