Bug#1086609: Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-12-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
I realized that the below response was sent to #1017646, but not #1086609, so I am sending it again here for anyone who is following the conversation. I really hope that we can ship a compliant version of scown in trixie. Currently, every hunspell package properly ships .bdic dictionaries excep

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-11-02 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Saturday, November 2, 2024 12:30:07 PM MST Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > On Friday, November 1, 2024 11:05:57 PM MST Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Where is this documented in the Debian dictionary policy? > > > > It is documented in the dictionaries-common p

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-11-02 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote: > On Friday, November 1, 2024 11:05:57 PM MST Don Armstrong wrote: > > Where is this documented in the Debian dictionary policy? > > It is documented in the dictionaries-common package. Specifically, you > can see the changes that were added to this packag

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-11-01 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Friday, November 1, 2024 11:05:57 PM MST Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote:\n > > > Control: -1 reopen > > > > As explained in the previous email, the consensus for how .bidc > > dictionaries should be configured has changed since the original patch > > was prepa

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-11-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote:\n > Control: -1 reopen > > As explained in the previous email, the consensus for how .bidc > dictionaries should be configured has changed since the original patch > was prepared. Attached is a patch that brings scowl into conformity. Where is this docume

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-10-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
Control: -1 reopen As explained in the previous email, the consensus for how .bidc dictionaries should be configured has changed since the original patch was prepared. Attached is a patch that brings scowl into conformity. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.orgdiff --git a/debian/changelog b/debi

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-09-26 Thread Soren Stoutner
Don, On Wednesday, September 25, 2024 9:59:25 PM MST Don Armstrong wrote: > I've got the patch for it, I think it just needs a new release to > include it. Thanks for doing this, but I think your patch is based on an older attempt to implement this. Based on the consensus discussion [1] the fol

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-09-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Most of the Hunspell packages now build binary .bdic dictionaries. I > would like to see scowl do so as well. Would you be interested in a > patch implementing this feature? I've got the patch for it, I think it just needs a new release to include it.

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2024-09-25 Thread Soren Stoutner
Don, Most of the Hunspell packages now build binary .bdic dictionaries. I would like to see scowl do so as well. Would you be interested in a patch implementing this feature? Soren -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1017646: scowl: Ship qtwebengine-dictionary binaries

2022-08-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I thought about creating a separate source package for this, but it > seems to make more sense to me to include this as separate binaries in > the current scowl package. I am willing to submit a patch and assist > with maintining it over time if you woul