On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I thought about creating a separate source package for this, but it > seems to make more sense to me to include this as separate binaries in > the current scowl package. I am willing to submit a patch and assist > with maintining it over time if you would like.
Yeah, this should definitely be a patch to produce the additional binary packages [or potentially, the existing binary packages can produce the combined dictionary files, depending on the relative sizes.] Is there a naming convention for these packages already? Thanks! -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com Live and learn or die and teach by example -- a softer world #625 http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=625
