On 2022-11-01, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
> Le 23/09/2022 à 19:22, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
>> On 2022-09-23, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
>>> wrote:
On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
>>
Hi Jonas, Vagrant,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:18:11 +0100 Arnaud Ferraris
wrote:
> >
> > I think it's reasonable, though you'd have to encourage packages to
> > *not* use /etc/u-boot-menu*.d, maybe documenting it in
> > README.Debian...
>
> I added some notes about this in both the manpage and a (n
Hi,
Le 23/09/2022 à 19:22, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
On 2022-09-23, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configura
Hi Jonas,
Le 24/09/2022 à 00:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-09-23 14:51:40)
On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Seems more sensible for me, however, to implement this using debconf.
[ thoughts on no
Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-09-23 14:51:40)
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
> wrote:
> > On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Seems more sensible for me, however, to implement this using debconf.
[ thoughts on non-debconf mechanism snipped ]
> > That seems a lot
On 2022-09-23, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
> wrote:
>> On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
>> >> Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configuration file
>> >> one has to edit in order to
On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:18:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
>> Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configuration file
>> one has to edit in order to change the default options. It could
>> be useful to
On 2022-06-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
>> Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configuration file
>> one has to edit in order to change the default options. It could
>> be useful to use config fragments containing only one (or more)
>> variable
Le 04/06/2022 à 17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Thanks, that sounds like a useful feature indeed.
Seems more sensible for me, however, to implement this using debconf.
Otherwise, installation and removal of a package would need to trigger
u-boot-menu, and u-boot-menu would need to specially
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-06-04 17:39:23)
> Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
> > Please note this has been previously submitted as a merge request
> > on salsa
>
> Thanks for reporting here as a bugreport: Debian uses debbugs for
> tracking issues. Salsa confusingly ofer isue tr
Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2022-06-04 16:39:03)
> Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configuration file
> one has to edit in order to change the default options. It could
> be useful to use config fragments containing only one (or more)
> variables, so that different packages could change di
Source: u-boot-menu
Version: 4.0.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: arnaud.ferra...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Currently u-boot-menu makes use of a single configuration file
one has to edit in order to change the default options. It could
be useful to use config fragments containing o
12 matches
Mail list logo
