Hi Jonas, Vagrant,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:18:11 +0100 Arnaud Ferraris <aferra...@debian.org>
wrote:
> >
> > I think it's reasonable, though you'd have to encourage packages to
> > *not* use /etc/u-boot-menu*.d, maybe documenting it in
> > README.Debian...
>
> I added some notes about this in both the manpage and a (new)
README.Debian
>
> >
> > I could see a preference order being /etc/default/u-boot which is
> > overidden by /usr/share/u-boot-menu/conf.d which is overridden by
> > /etc/u-boot-menu.d (or /etc/u-boot-menu/conf.d ?).
>
> Yes, that makes the most sense to me (I also used
> /etc/u-boot-menu/conf.d instead of /etc/u-boot-menu.d for consistency).
>
> >
> > A fancy implementation might allow /etc to override /usr/share if the
> > filenames match, but that might be more complicated than it's
> > worth. Jonas knows I've fallen into that rabbit hole in packages of the
> > ancient past... :)
>
> Hmm, I don't think that's worth the hassle as it would add *a lot* of
> complexity for very little gain IMHO.
>
Gentle ping :)
