On 2022-05-30 13:49:57 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> 3. i understand sebastinas' annoyance if they feel somebody is on a crusade
> against pipewire (but i haven't followed any of the discussion except
> for this bug-report on the thread on debian-devel@ to acknowledge
> whether there is an ac
Package: libpipewire-0.3-0
Version: 0.3.51-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #1011130
Dear Maintainer,
just for the record (with a bit of pro-audio background).
1. i wholeheartedly welcome "pipewire" and cannot wait until it becomes
the default soundsystem for Debian. (pulse be gone! it's been a pain)
2.
Control: severity -1 normal
On 2022-05-17 13:20:30, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: libpipewire-0.3-0
> Version: 0.3.51-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Several packages depend on libpipewire-0.3-0 in order to have
> pipewire *support* (but they don't need p
Package: libpipewire-0.3-0
Version: 0.3.51-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Several packages depend on libpipewire-0.3-0 in order to have
pipewire *support* (but they don't need pipewire: the user may
want to use pulseaudio). However, libpipewire-0.3-0 currently
has "R
4 matches
Mail list logo
