Hi,
On 06/27/2015 09:10 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> [..]
>
> My patch changed the footer.html file since that was where the date was
> coming from. I can set HTML_TIMESTAMPS as well if you want (but I don't
> think it will do anything here).
I am sorry, you are right the patch I made will not wo
Hi,
On 06/24/2015 01:50 AM, Martin Quinson wrote:
> [..]
>> +--- simgrid-3.11.1.orig/buildtools/Cmake/GenerateDoc.cmake
>> simgrid-3.11.1/buildtools/Cmake/GenerateDoc.cmake
>> +@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ if(DOXYGEN_FOUND)
>> + ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(TARGET simgrid_documentation
>> + COMMAND ${FIG2DE
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:25:04 +0100 "W. Martin Borgert"
wrote:
>[..]
> Do you think,
> not having timestamps in HTML generated by doxygen would be
> a useful default? Maybe even acceptable by upstream?
>
Doxygen upstream has agreed to change the default value of
HTML_TIMESTAMP from YES to NO
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 0.9.0.dfsg-11
Hi,
your last upload included my patch but the name of the patch was not
included in debian/patches/series and was thus not applied.
Cheers,
akira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Control: tag -1 + patch
here is the patch
Description: Changed HTML_TIMESTAMP value from YES to NO
--- colobot-0.1.3.orig/Doxyfile.in
+++ colobot-0.1.3/Doxyfile.in
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ HTML_COLORSTYLE_GAMMA = 80
# page will contain the date and time when the page was generated. Setting
# this t
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750447
Hi,
On Mon, 18 May 2015 14:24:26 +0200 Christoph Berg
wrote:
> It would be nice if doxygen offered a way to disable the timestamps,
> or to use a fixed/predetermined timestamp.
After finding the same problem in coin3 I forw
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:00:36 +0200 Maria Valentina Marin
wrote:
> The attached patch changes the value of HTML_TIMESTAMP in upstream's
and here comes the patch
Description: Changed the value of the variable HTML_timestamp from YES to NO
--- cassiopee-1.0.3+dfsg.orig/src/Doxyfile.in
+++ cassiopee-
Hi,
I am very sorry for not replying earlier. These past month has been very
stressful in my private life and in university. Could you go ahead and
forward the patch upstream?
Thank You
akira
On 04/26/2015 11:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (19 Mar 2015 13:37:45 GMT) :
Maria Va
Hi,
On 03/02/2015 07:41 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
I would like to know how other maintainers think about this issue and
wait until it is clear whether this issue will be fixed in Debian's
doxygen package or not. If it turns out that the project favors the
"patch-all-affected-packages" approach,
On 02/25/2015 08:15 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
1. doxygen should be patched and always set HTML_TIMESTAMPS = NO in
Debian.
Debian doxygen maintainers seem to be reluctant to deviate from upstream
(see #778490). So I filed a bug report to upstream about changing the
default (see https://b
Hi Markus,
On 02/25/2015 07:16 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
thanks for the report and the patch! However wouldn't it make more sense
to add a feature to dh_doxygen that automatically sets
HTML_TIMESTAMPS=NO, so that this is fixed once and for all instead of
patching individual packages?
I don't
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:59:00 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
such a patch should not be applied unless it is applied upstream. Is this
forwarded?
I added the "forwarded" tag to this bug 3 days ago, here is the url again:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744938
In case upstream reject
12 matches
Mail list logo
