Hi,
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 21:36:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 06-03-2022 11:30, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>> As I can see, there is only one reverse build-dependency on swi-prolog
>> apart from eye and logol, that is ppl. It is a C++ library providing
>> SWI-Prolog interface. I tried to build it again
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 01:09:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 04-03-2022 11:42, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
>>> build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
>>> removing the block. But I'm afraid (without check
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-04 00:46:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>> swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
>> require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
>> Specifically, in this case logol requires version 6
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-03 00:44:
> On 01-03-2022 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This "fix" suggest there may be more breakage, normally the Release Team
>> would schedule binNMU's. Can you please elaborate how ABI is normally
>> maintained within swi-prolog, such that the rebuilds can
Hi Olivier!
> ok,
> I uploaded logol 1.7.9+dfsg-2 built against swi-prolog 8.4.2 and
> closing the issue with upload.
> Let's see what happens for migration.
Thank you!
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior писал 2022-02-28 03:41:
> Source: swi-prolog
> Version: 8.2.4+dfsg-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: bookworm sid
> User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
>
> Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
> followi
Dear Olivier,
sorry for the delay with my message and thanks for your input.
olivier sallou писал 2022-02-25 12:12:
> ok,
> after a quick look, issue is Logol is compiled against swi-prolog, and
> there is an ABI issue I think, getting error:
>
> incompatible version (file: 67, Prolog: 68)]
>
>
Hi Hugh,
Thanks for your reply.
Hugh McMaster писал 2022-02-19 14:11:
> Hi Lev,
>
> Thank you for the bug report.
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 04:45, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>>
>> unixodbc-dev does not ship unixodbc_conf.h (at least, on amd64 and
>> i386). The version in stable does ship it, but the
8 matches
Mail list logo
