Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 01:09:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 04-03-2022 11:42, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
>>> build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
>>> removing the block. But I'm afraid (without checking from my side)
>>> that the other package don't have the right virtual ABI package in
>>> their dependencies. If they do, wouldn't they need a rebuild too?
>>
>> New upstream version of eye was uploaded the same day as new version
>> of swi-prolog (in fact, after swi-prolog), and its autopkgtests pass
>> with swi-prolog in unstable (on amd64, and these are "not a regression"
>> on other architectures; they never were successful since at least Nov
>> 2019, as I can see).
>>
>> And eye already does this:
>>
>> Package: eye
>> Depends:
>> swi-prolog-nox,
>> swi-prolog-abi-${prolog:ABI},
>> ${misc:Depends}
>
> I already mentioned `eye` explicitly in my earlier messages, I wasn't
> worried about it. Please comment on the other reverse build
> dependencies (apart from eye and logol).
As I can see, there is only one reverse build-dependency on swi-prolog
apart from eye and logol, that is ppl. It is a C++ library providing
SWI-Prolog interface. I tried to build it against swi-prolog from
unstable on amd64 porterbox and the build was successful (including
tests, which are unfortunately not autopkgtest-ready).
Regards,
Lev
