Bug#1050872: MIPS Linux kernel versions for trixie/sid

2025-04-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >I have a workaround in a package where I (also) build binaries >against Linux klibc to not do that for mipsel and mips64el as >klibc 2.0.13+ needs kernel 5.1+ and some buildds and possibly >other infrastructure or relevant users were still on 4.x kernels While https://bugs.debian.org/

Bug#1104049: bash-completion: bashism in /etc/profile.d/ snippet

2025-04-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod: >Justification: Policy 10.4 Policy has an extra requirement on top of POSIX that -a is supported, but /etc/profile can be read by shells not suitable for /bin/sh in Debian, so a fix would still be appreciated, but I don’t insist on rc severity. bye, //mirabilos -- “It is inappropriat

Bug#1103775: reverse dependency

2025-04-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
. Thorsten

Bug#1103366: reverse dependency

2025-04-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, there is a reverse dependency that needs to be taken care of: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: ruby-faker: ruby-saml In case it matters, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1104049: bash-completion: bashism in /etc/profile.d/ snippet

2025-04-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: bash-completion Version: 1:2.11-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 Tags: bookworm trixie sid Control: found -1 1:2.16.0-7 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de /etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh has: if [ "x${BASH_VERSION-}" != x -a "x${PS1-}" != x -a "x${BASH_COMPLETION_VERSINFO-}" =

Bug#1104005: unblock: displaylink-driver/6.1-2

2025-04-23 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
is pretty minimal. [ Risks ] Fairly minimal, since it has no rdeps. unblock displaylink-driver/6.1-2 Thanks! Thorsten

Bug#1070860: musescore3: CVE-2023-44428

2025-04-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >This looks good to me! Thanks! >could you please make uploads for musescore2 and musescore3 >with this file added before the trixie freeze? Will do. I had other changes piled up, but not all of the fixes that I think are needed, and these I have no

Bug#1101709: RM: siggen -- ROM; software is not worth to be fixed with gcc14

2025-03-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
... Thorsten

Bug#1100873: Conflicting binary packages (Was: Bug#1100873: urjtag_2021.03-3_ppc64el-buildd.changes REJECTED)

2025-03-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
and asked for an evaluation. As I now understand nobody in this team was interested in that package anymore, so nobody was going to answer your request. I did answer your second email and asked you to clean up your mess. 8. Thorsten answered[7] only to the list which I do not read regularly

Bug#1094807: RM: pcre3 -- ROM; Long obsolete

2025-03-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025, Matthew Vernon wrote: > I'm sorry that my MBF didn't find the issue; presumably the package concerned > didn't specify a Build-Depends on pcre3? Yes, exactly: it was only used in debian/tests/control as runtime dependency for autopkgtests, to work around a bug in GNU grep (wh

Bug#1094807: RM: pcre3 -- ROM; Long obsolete

2025-03-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: >I agree. I checked all the breakage Unfortunately, neither got the debian/tests/control dependencies, so I had the pleasure to receive an RC bug in my package, which used pcregrep, this short before the freeze, with no advance notice at all. Please

Bug#1100955: initscripts: Wants to remove the running kernel

2025-03-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: >~#apt-get dist-upgrade > > * What was the outcome of this action? > >The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: > dracut-install libatopology2t64 linux-doc-6.1 >Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. >The follo

Bug#922423: initscripts: formatting of scripts

2025-03-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Mark Hindley wrote: > Scripts should follow the style produced by shfmt(1) FWIW, never heard of that tool. > - case indented Don’t indent case, it’s useless and just adds clutter. You cannot have something other than the pattern inside, so: case $foo in (bar) echo

Bug#1100588: encfs: After the upgrade to libtinyxml2-10_10.1.0, encfs no longer works

2025-03-16 Thread Thorsten Bonow
Dear Maintainer, I can confirm that on my system, a local rebuild of the encfs package, without any manual changes, fixes the problem. -- Toto

Bug#1100588: encfs: After the upgrade to libtinyxml2-10_10.1.0, encfs no longer works

2025-03-15 Thread Thorsten Bonow
Package: encfs Version: 1.9.5-2+b2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, encfs segfaults on my system: $ encfs --verbose ~/.crypt ~/crypt VERBOSE Root directory: /home/toto/.crypt/ [main.cpp:686] VERBOSE Fuse arguments: (daemon) (threaded) (keyCheck) encfs /hom

Bug#1100375: RM: libosmo-abis [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; software no longer works on 32bit architectures

2025-03-15 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:libosmo-abis Unfortunately libosmo-abis got a new dependency (libosmo-netif), which is not available on 32bit architectures. Thorsten

Bug#1023117: cups-filters: Permissions should be 755 or 644

2025-03-15 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, is there any bug resulting from these file permissions? Is there something not working? Thorsten

Bug#1100423: RM: afnix [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; software no longer works on 32bit architectures

2025-03-13 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:afnix Unfortunately this software no longer runs on 32bit architectures. The time to fix this is better spent on other things. Thorsten

Bug#1100334: RM: libosmo-sccp [all] -- ROM; doc package for arch=all is no longer built

2025-03-12 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:libosmo-sccp The arch:all package libosmo-sigtran-doc is no longer built from this source package. Thorsten

Bug#1092101: [Debian-mobcom-maintainers] Bug#1092101: RFP: osmo-cbc -- Osmocom Cell Broadcast Centre

2025-03-11 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Guido, On Tue, 11 Mar 2025, Guido Günther wrote: I have a package at https://salsa.debian.org/agx/osmo-cbc/ . Should we move that under the "Debian Mobcom maintaienrs" umbrella? oh, you beat me to it. Yes, moving would be fine. Am I to do anything? Thorsten

Bug#1099645: [Debian-mobcom-maintainers] Bug#1099645: libosmo-abis: build-depends on osmocom-dahdi-source, which is no longer built

2025-03-07 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Bastian Germann wrote: Control: tags -1 patch I am uploading a NMU with the attached change as this is hindering the whole linphone stack to migrate. Great job, an uncoordinated upload. Thanks for nothing!

Bug#1094245: New upstream version xxx

2025-03-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, Sam Pinkus wrote: > On 29/1/25 06:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>>override_dh_update_autotools_config: >>>     ./autogen.sh >> How is this different from the current autoreconf step that is >> already as part of dh? Not effectively, other than being vulnerable

Bug#932362: move /etc/init.d/mountnfs.sh to bin:nfs-common

2025-03-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Mark Hindley dixit: >So, I am inclined to close. What do you think? I guess so, the warning is gone anyway. bye, //mirabilos -- "Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."

Bug#1099552: ocrfeeder depends on python3-standard-imghr; won't start

2025-03-04 Thread Thorsten Bonow
Package: ocrfeeder Version: 0.8.5-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, ocrfeeder depends on python3-standard-imghr, it won't start without that package installed, but the ocrfeeder package doesn't list it as a dependency: $ ocrfeeder [11:49:05] Traceback (most rec

Bug#1099460: RM: meep-mpi-default [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; software no longer works on 32bit architectures

2025-03-03 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:meep-mpi-default Unfortunately this software no longer runs on 32bit architectures. The time to fix this is better spent on other things. Thorsten

Bug#1099459: RM: meep [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; software no longer works on 32bit architectures

2025-03-03 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:meep Unfortunately this software no longer runs on 32bit architectures. The time to fix this is better spent on other things. Thorsten

Bug#1098778: ntpsec: 'pool' directive causes duplicate server entries

2025-03-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025, Richard Laager wrote: > On 2025-03-03 05:16, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Is there a way to say “give me only v4 or only v6 from this pool” > > I haven't tested, but you could try: > > pool -4 > pool -6 Ah! I hadn’t tested it as it’s only documente

Bug#1098778: ntpsec: 'pool' directive causes duplicate server entries

2025-03-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025, Richard Laager wrote: > What does `ntpq -pn` report? > > I suspect the answer is that you are getting the server once with IPv4 > and once with IPv6. Bingo. Incidentally, for the other pool (of a massive size, 4×Legacy IP, 5×IPv6) I’m using, I use a specific alias to only ge

Bug#1065698: update-initramfs: -k all stopped working

2025-03-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Ben >It works for me. unfortunately, I do not have the system in question any more. Looking at the version, it’s the same as in bookworm (sans deb12u1), and a bookworm/armel system I have (RPi 1) indeed succeeds. >- What's the full command line that doesn't work? sudo update-initram

Bug#1098905: elpa-key-chord: incompatibility with Gnu Emacs 30

2025-02-25 Thread Thorsten Bonow
es this bug but has other changes, too. (https://github.com/emacsorphanage/key-chord) -- Thorsten Bonow -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.16-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads;

Bug#1098778: ntpsec: 'pool' directive causes duplicate server entries

2025-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: ntpsec Version: 1.2.3+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de With 'pool ntp.hetzner.de' in the config, I get multiple entries of the same servers in 'ntpq -p': $ sudo ntpq -p remote

Bug#1098638: fdisk: creates partitions one sector too large

2025-02-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >I’ve only tested that with GPT at the moment. Same for MBR: Command (m for help): n Partition type p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free) e extended (container for logical partitions) Select (default p): p Partition number (1-4, default 1): 1 First sector (2048-10002152

Bug#1098638: fdisk: creates partitions one sector too large

2025-02-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: fdisk Version: 2.38.1-5+deb12u1 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de When I create a new partition with +sectors, fdisk creates one that is one sector too large: Command (m for help): n Partition number (1-128, default 1): First sector (2048-7814037134, default 2048): Last sector, +/-sectors or

Bug#1080330: bug#73928: Bug#1080330: coreutils: who no longer works

2025-02-17 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:25 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2025-02-17 08:03:23 +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > Some terminal applications (e.g. xterm, konsole, ...) create fake utmp > > entries for historic reasons: so that broadcast messages are shown in > > every si

Bug#1080330: bug#73928: Bug#1080330: coreutils: who no longer works

2025-02-17 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
Applications are doing that via glibc. But this will go away with glibc 2.42, when this functions don't do anything anymore. And this will not happen if distributions don't create /run/utmp on boot. glibc only writes to this files if they exist, it will not create them. Thorsten -- Th

Bug#1080330: bug#73928: Bug#1080330: coreutils: who no longer works

2025-02-17 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 8:40 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 2025-02-16 23:03, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > The problems were already all solved with the first coreutils versions > > having systemd-logind support. Even with all the bug reports I don't > > see a need for

Bug#1080330: bug#73928: Bug#1080330: coreutils: who no longer works

2025-02-16 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
and wtmp. Latest with this all applications should use systemd-logind and wtmpdb as replacement. > Perhaps whoever has changed the longstanding API (is that Thorsten > Kukuk, or someone else? anyway I'll cc Thorsten) can chime in with a > proposed patch to bleeding-edge GNU coreut

Bug#1092364: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1092364: cluster3: needs rebuild for Python 3.13 as default

2025-02-16 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Etienne, yes, from my point of view removal is fine.   Thorsten

Bug#1095791: dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds

2025-02-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Guillem Jover wrote: >> >This bug does not count as RC just because Debian upload bureaucracy >> >hasn't been performed yet. >> >> If packagers cannot rely on Policy to give correct information, what >> *can* they rely on? > >This is not how Debian Policy has ever worked. By t

Bug#1095932: openjdk-8: Misbuilds packages when calling only binary-* targets

2025-02-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Guillem Jover wrote: >As was discovered in bug #1095746, this package misbuilds when calling >for example «fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch» w/o first calling >«debian/rules build-arch», which is a policy violation: Yes. I noticed yesterday (or so… memory is a bit fuzzy) and

Bug#1095791: dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds

2025-02-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Sean Whitton wrote: >Policy has to go through binary-NEW in order to be released. So there Technicalities. >isn't a quick fix here. Not looking for one. dpkg should revert this until then. >This bug does not count as RC just because Debian upload bureaucracy >hasn't been

Bug#1095791: dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds

2025-02-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
severity 1095791 serious thanks On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Guillem Jover wrote: >> >From what I can tell from other mails, I believe the package in >> question is openjdk-8 (unstable only); see bug #1095746. > >Ah, thanks for the context. In that case, going by that bug report, it >looks like openjdk-8

Bug#1093878: openjdk-8: CVE-2025-21502

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > From the affected versions, I believe this affects Oracle Java 8 > Enterprise Performance Pack, but not OpenJDK 8 Meanwhile, after several mails back and forth, I managed to extract useful information from the Oracle employee who deigned to res

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >One thing I do can see is that the older build called >debian/rules build-arch before debian/rules binary-arch, >the newer calls only the latter. So, perhaps, some value >that got reobtained is now cached? (But why only the one?) > >Investigation continues. It’s an incompatible change

Bug#1095791: dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: dpkg Version: 1.22.13 Severity: serious Justification: Policy §5.6.31 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de dpkg 1.22.13 implemented a backwards-incompatible change, violating Policy (which states the default value is most certainly *not* “no”) and breaking builds of packages. dpkg (1.22.13) unsta

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
>These seem to be the only ones affected, from the apt-get install >output, though I’ll also look at the packages. I’ll investigate. Best I can say at this point is that the wildcard in… all_jre_tools = $(filter-out javaws, $(notdir $(wildcard $(builddir)/$(jreimg)/bin/*))) jre_tools = $

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
reassign 1095746 openjdk-8-jre-headless thanks On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Matthias Mueller wrote: >The Link from /etc/alternatives/java -> >/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1. Ouch, indeed. This is… surprising, there’s not been a deliberate change even near that area.

Bug#1008911: initscripts: /run often mounted nodev, "/run/rootdev" likely to fail

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Mark Hindley wrote: >or what an initramfs might have setup. This is probably a point. So, put it under /dev, which has this purpose. bye, //mirabilos -- den AGP stecker anfeilen, damit er in den slot aufm 440BX board passt… oder netzteile, an die man auch den monitor anges

Bug#1085142: Produces PPD files with invalid hash character in size names.

2025-02-10 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Agustin, thanks a lot for taking care of this1 @Marcin: did you try the patch from Agustin and does it help with your problem? Thorsten

Bug#1093878: Q about 8u442 applicability of JDK-8330045 (Enhance array handling) / CVE-2025-21502

2025-02-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, David Holmes wrote: > 8u-perf is an Oracle product. You won't find any links to commits for it. Guess so. >> I also cannot read JDK-8330045 (wants a login, in contrast to the >> other JDK-### bugs I peeked into). >> >> So, what’s the state of this? > > The entry here lis

Bug#1095633: vim: FTBFS in stable: fails tests

2025-02-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: vim Version: 2:9.0.1378-2+deb12u1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: security bookworm James McCoy indicated that… >Indeed, upstream ended up disabling the test that 9.0.1532 introduced >because it took too long: > >https://github.com/vim/vim/compare/v9.0.1533...v9.0.1535 What

Bug#1093878: Q about 8u442 applicability of JDK-8330045 (Enhance array handling) / CVE-2025-21502

2025-02-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, I’ve got this report against openjdk-8 in Debian about CVE-2025-21502 and I cannot find whether this even affects openjdk-8 at all, nor if it’s fixed in 8u442. There are links to commits in 21/17/11 and a page saying Oracle’s 8u431-perf is affected with the fix in 8u441-perf, but without a li

Bug#1094990: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#1094990: puppet crash on trixie

2025-02-03 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, Jérôme Charaoui wrote: According to the log it seems like there's a segfault happening in the Ruby SELinux binding. Do you have SELinux installed/enabled on this system? libselinux1 and ruby-selinux were installed, but I think SELinux was not configured at all. After

Bug#1093393: alpine: broken date format

2025-02-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >I had a look through the setup screen to check for an option to >configure the date format, which was ENOENT. Oh goodie, it sort of honours LC_TIME but sort of doesn’t, now I have mails from “Jan 14”… which is *still* wrong as the locale sa

Bug#1085065: vim: FTBFS: failing tests

2025-02-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
severity 1085065 serious found 1085065 2:9.0.1378-2+deb12u1 thanks This is now affecting stable-security builds.

Bug#1094990: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#1094990: puppet crash on trixie

2025-02-02 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
ould still have the default configuration of Trixie.    Thorsten

Bug#1094182: lazarus-src-3.8: Package install fails with error "Syntax error: "fi" unexpected"

2025-01-25 Thread Thorsten de Jong
s-3.8: lazarus-3.8 hängt ab von lazarus-src-3.8 (>= 3.8+dfsg1-1); aber: Paket lazarus-src-3.8 ist nicht installiert. " Sincerely, Thorsten de Jong. *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did

Bug#1094037: [Debian-mobcom-maintainers] Bug#1094037: osmo-bsc: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libmbedcrypto7t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedtls14t64 (>= 2.28.0), libmbedx509-1t64 (>= 2.28.0)

2025-01-24 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Lukas, didn't you assign this and other related bugs to the wrong package? osmo-bsc does not directly depend on either bctoolbox or mbedtls!? So how could I fix this issue? Thorsten

Bug#929983: ipxe-qemu: virtio booting no longer works after upgrade to buster

2025-01-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
retitle 929983 ipxe-qemu: virtio booting no longer works after upgrade to buster due to machine type support change tags 929983 + wontfix close 929983 thanks On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote: >Reading through the messages to this bug, I am afraid there's nothing >that can be done about it a

Bug#689456: alpine: does not interpret timezone offsets in date headers

2025-01-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Dominik George wrote: >The tiem information in the thread index does not take into account >timezone offsets. This has bugged me for a while as well. As far as I can tell, the setup option “Convert Dates To Localtime” (pinerc feature-list convert-dates-to-localtime) is suppos

Bug#1093393: alpine: broken date format

2025-01-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: alpine Version: 2.26+dfsg-1~bpo11+1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de Besides the awful “Yesterday”, “Monday”, etc. (which in itself is a regression to pine’s always using the “Jan 17” format), it uses “02/06/18” for older messages, which is just plain broken. I had a look th

Bug#1093002: rng-tools-debian: systemd service fails instead of skipping

2025-01-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Luca Boccassi wrote: >This is an anti-pattern, and best avoided. What's the problem if the >script runs twice? If it just detects things it should be just fine, Extra effort, though. And, in general, TOCTOU, but probably not applicable here. bye, //mirabilos -- den AGP ste

Bug#1093002: rng-tools-debian: systemd service fails instead of skipping

2025-01-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote: >> If not, I’d lean towards one (which?) of the errorlevel-using ones, >> because otherwise we’d have to run the detection code twice. > >Not sure what you mean by 'one of the errorlevel-using ones'. Please >explain your idea in more details. SuccessExitStat

Bug#1093002: rng-tools-debian: systemd service fails instead of skipping

2025-01-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504044#162 >Applying ExecCondition to me seems the most reasonable solution to this >bug. Can the script behind ExecCondition pass variables to the script behind ExecStart or, even better, the unit itself

Bug#1093002: rng-tools-debian: systemd service fails instead of skipping

2025-01-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Luca Boccassi wrote: >It looks like this is doing some checks, and intends to skip. But just >exiting means the service is recorded as failed, and this will likely >trip other tests, hence the severity to stop migrating to testing for >now. Ah, ouch. Agreed. >There are sever

Bug#1092822: autopkgtest: probably does not need rng-tools* any more

2025-01-12 Thread Thorsten Glaser
(tl;dr at the end) Paride Legovini dixit: >Hello Thorsten and thanks for the suggestion. Currently autopkgtest is >used to test systems as old a Ubuntu Trusty, which ships with Linux >3.13, so what you suggest is too modern. Ah, you test the older systems from a newer host and w

Bug#1092822: autopkgtest: probably does not need rng-tools* any more

2025-01-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: autopkgtest X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@debian.org, s...@debian.org Hello! It has come to my attention that autopkgtest currently depends on rng-tools-debian as provider of rng-tools for its VMs to ensure entropy is available, or something. If the entropy provider uses the hwrng subsystem (HRNGDE

Bug#504044: rng-tools-debian: systemd complains about missing unit file

2025-01-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024, Sven Geuer wrote: >Feel free to integrate my additions into your repo. You might want to >test the sysv-init functionality still works. According to my tests >sysv-init and systemd unit work flawlessly at least when running >autopkgtest from a Qemu VM. I’ve integrated that, b

Bug#1092660: openjdk-8 builds using GCC 13

2025-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit: > openjdk-8 still builds using GCC 13, please try to build with the > default GCC. I check the various distros’ default GCC versions before each upload I do, so we’ll try for 8u442. Do you happen to know whether 8u supports GCC 14 by now or whether there are any known issue

Bug#774565: oh, still not jsdoc3

2025-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
reopen 774565 thanks node-jsdoc2 is not jsdoc 3.x :/

Bug#1076728: elogind: privileged operation with polkit fails

2025-01-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025, Andrew Bower wrote: >On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:53:47AM +, Mark Hindley wrote: >> Looking at docker.io's initscript, it checks if /sys/fs/cgroup is a mount >> point >> before mounting cgroups there. So, adding elogind to LSB header >> 'Should-Start' >I just tried exactly

Bug#1092101: [Debian-mobcom-maintainers] Bug#1092101: RFP: osmo-cbc -- Osmocom Cell Broadcast Centre

2025-01-05 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Guido, On 04.01.25 15:40, Guido Günther wrote: Would the current osmocom stack maintainers be interested in packaging this? yes, this is already on our list.    Thorsten

Bug#1074595: dygraphs: Move from jsdoc-toolkit to node-jsdoc2

2024-12-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024, Georges Khaznadar wrote: >The patch comes as >https://github.com/georgesk/dygraphs/blob/debian/debian/patches/node-jsdoc2.patch > >I guess that node-jsdoc2 may be stable for some time in the near future. > >If you do not mind, I am uploading a NMU for the package libjs-dygrap

Bug#1091448: linux: CDROM_LOCKDOOR does not lock the door

2024-12-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.226-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de I wrote a program to run… ioctl(i, CDROM_LOCKDOOR, 1) … on /dev/cdrom aka /dev/sr0, and it executes correctly. The program then holds the file descriptor open until SIGTERM. However, the only effect of th

Bug#1089633: RFS: adminerevo/4.8.4-1 [ITP] -- Web-based database administration tool

2024-12-22 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
source: renamed-tag debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature => debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/source/lintian-overrides:1] X: adminerevo source: update-debian-copyright 2017 vs 2024 [debian/copyright:18] Thorsten

Bug#1090977: RM: sbox-dtc -- RoQA; not in testing, unmaintained, ~0 popcon, dead upstream

2024-12-21 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Helmut is much more transparent, gives everybody enough time to react and immediately gives all information needed to process such bugs.   Thorsten

Bug#1090911: Mass removal of packages blocking ruby 3.3 transition

2024-12-20 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Lucas, please file a RM bug for each package and also take care of each reverse dependency. Thorsten

Bug#1089812: poppler-data: cmap vs. cMap vs. CMap case confusion?

2024-12-12 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: poppler-data Version: 0.4.10-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de I noticed this: /usr/share/fonts/cMap/Identity-UTF16-H /usr/share/fonts/cmap/Identity-H /usr/share/fonts/cmap/Identity-V /usr/share/fonts/cmap/adobe-cns1 /usr/share/fonts/cmap/adobe-gb1 /usr/share/fonts/cmap/ado

Bug#1089009: ftp.debian.org: Please add loong64 to the archive

2024-12-05 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi everybody, as someone has to start: there are no objections from the ftpmaster team to add loong64 to the archive.  Thorsten

Bug#995670: ITP: zig -- General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software

2024-11-29 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024, Nick Hastings wrote: >I'll likely not even try packaging 0.11 or newer until it can once again >bootstrap. However I don't expect that to happen anytime soon. You can do it like OpenJDK does. First, package 0.10.x which can be bootstrapped from C with just the included code.

Bug#1087996: reverse dependencies

2024-11-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
ntinue (y/N)? Aborted. In case they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1087989: reverse dependencies

2024-11-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
found. Continue (y/N)? Aborted. In case they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1085728: python-multipart: Make room for https://pypi.org/project/multipart/ somehow?

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
ut as this has nothing to do with any ftpmaster policy but is a decision of the Python team, I leave you free to decide what you like best. Thorsten

Bug#1085728: python-multipart: Make room for https://pypi.org/project/multipart/ somehow?

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Julian, On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: Unfortunately, the ftpmasters have made the decision that they now require new source package names that are specific to Python to have a source package name of python-* (unless the package name is already clearly Python specific). do you ha

Bug#1086436: reverse dependencies

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
ase they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1087068: reverse dependencies

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1086904: reverse dependencies

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
r-bioc-alabaster.base (1.4.2+ds-2~0exp3 >=) r-bioc-alabaster.matrix Dependency problem found. Continue (y/N)? Aborted. In case they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1087676: reverse dependencies

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
-elf picolibc: gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf Dependency problem found. Continue (y/N)? Aborted. In case they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1084735: reverse dependency

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1060453: reverse dependency

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1084025: reverse dependency

2024-11-25 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
-procfs-dev Dependency problem found. Continue (y/N)? Aborted. In case they matter, this needs to be addressed first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done. Thorsten

Bug#1087911: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1087911:

2024-11-21 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
ng a regression. It is by far worse to not be able to process an image with dcraw at all than to have no fix for a fictional security issue. And yes I did apply for CVE after your reply. Great, please share the number. Thorsten

Bug#1087911: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1087911:

2024-11-21 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
for a CVE for your issue. Did you already get one?   Thorsten * I understand your concern and thanks for your patience ___ Debian-astro-maintainers mailing list debian-astro-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.ne

Bug#1087911: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1087911: Memory leaks in dcraw

2024-11-21 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
as "unimportant" or "minor" by the Debian Security Team. What evidence do you have that this bug is different? Setting severity to normal again.   Thorsten

Bug#921657: xvfb-run: -e /dev/stderr does not work

2024-11-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Simon McVittie wrote: >On Thu, 07 Feb 2019 at 17:59:42 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> + xvfb-run -a -e /dev/stderr -s '-screen 0 1024x768x24 -fbdir /var/tmp' -- >> ctest -O ctest.log -j8 --output-on-failure >> /usr/bin/xvfb-run: 159: /usr/b

Bug#1087915: dateutils: naming convention should be reverted to developer's names, current ones unwieldy and unnecessary

2024-11-20 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
c) the changes are unnecessary and should be reverted back. but users are already used to the changed names. Why do you want to break their scripts, workflows or whatever? Do those additional links bring any trouble?   Thorsten

Bug#1031749: afnix FTBFS on 32bit: afnix-bexec: failure t_utility

2024-11-19 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, t_utility fails in: if (Utility::hashs ("a")  != "509C42B379FE4842") return 1; and later other tests fail as well. So there seems to be a real problem with 32bits architectures and I would suggest to remove all 32bit versions and only keep at least the 64bit ones.   Thorsten

Bug#1087148: firefox-esr: [regression] leaves even unchanged sqlite files open

2024-11-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: firefox-esr Version: 128.4.0esr-1~deb11u1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de, debian-...@lists.debian.org Ever since the major upgrade to 128, I noticed during backing up my system that firefox-esr leaves all or almost all of the sqlite files open on exit as if it crashed, leav

Bug#539352: /etc/init.d/mountkernfs.sh: Please mount debugfs when available in the kernel

2024-11-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024, Mark Hindley wrote: >Reading the original thread, I share some of the concerns[1] about >enabling this globally. I’ve recently worked with debugfs+relayfs in a project, and I share the opinion of the kernel documentation that it should not be enabled by default (or rather, it

Bug#504044: hwrng

2024-11-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >Das schließt dann sogar den ursprünglichen #504044 und einige weitere, >da es für alle RNGs gilt, die das hwrng-Interface verwenden. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c?id=be4000bc4644d027c519b6361f5ae3bbfc52c347 bye

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >