On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote: >> If not, I’d lean towards one (which?) of the errorlevel-using ones, >> because otherwise we’d have to run the detection code twice. > >Not sure what you mean by 'one of the errorlevel-using ones'. Please >explain your idea in more details.
SuccessExitStatus or RestartPreventExitStatus, see further above in the thread. (I’d also s̲t̲i̲l̲l̲ like input from the systemd maintainers whether we should exec the binary from the wrapper script or call it in the background as is currently done.) Thanks, //mirabilos -- > Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks. Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine
